On 26.08.2014 15:07, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/22/2014 10:31 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
If the qcow2 check function detects a refcount block located beyond the
image end, grow the image appropriately. This cannot break anything and
is the logical fix for such a case.
Does the testsuite cover this one?
On 08/22/2014 10:31 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> If the qcow2 check function detects a refcount block located beyond the
> image end, grow the image appropriately. This cannot break anything and
> is the logical fix for such a case.
Does the testsuite cover this one? I didn't see it mentioned in patch 1
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 06:31:39PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> If the qcow2 check function detects a refcount block located beyond the
> image end, grow the image appropriately. This cannot break anything and
> is the logical fix for such a case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
> ---
> block/qcow2-re
If the qcow2 check function detects a refcount block located beyond the
image end, grow the image appropriately. This cannot break anything and
is the logical fix for such a case.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block/qcow2-refcount.c | 50 ++
1 file
