On 19.05.14 22:33, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 05/19/2014 09:45 AM, Marc Marí wrote:
This STDOUT vs _log() choice is a bit irregular, and I think you might
be better off abandoning it completely. Richard, Alex, do we really
need to opt
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 09:45 AM, Marc Marí wrote:
>>> > This STDOUT vs _log() choice is a bit irregular, and I think you might
>>> > be better off abandoning it completely. Richard, Alex, do we really
>>> > need to optionally route printfery to lo
On 05/19/2014 09:45 AM, Marc Marí wrote:
>> > This STDOUT vs _log() choice is a bit irregular, and I think you might
>> > be better off abandoning it completely. Richard, Alex, do we really
>> > need to optionally route printfery to log or stderr? (considering _log
>> > is NOW stderr by default now
El Sun, 18 May 2014 19:37:12 +1000
Peter Crosthwaite escribió:
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Marc Marí
> wrote:
> > Modify debug macros to have the same format through the codebase
> > and use regular ifs instead of ifdef.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Marí
> > ---
> > hw/s390x/s390-virtio-b
On 18.05.14 11:37, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Marc Marí wrote:
Modify debug macros to have the same format through the codebase and use regular
ifs instead of ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Marc Marí
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c |9 +
hw/s390x/s390-virt
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Marc Marí wrote:
> Modify debug macros to have the same format through the codebase and use
> regular
> ifs instead of ifdef.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Marí
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c |9 +
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c |9 +
> targe
Modify debug macros to have the same format through the codebase and use regular
ifs instead of ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Marc Marí
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-bus.c |9 +
hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c |9 +
target-s390x/helper.c | 23 +++
target-s390x/kv
