Hi
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/03/2015 17:52, Jeremy White wrote:
>> It seemed as though the convention was that all non static functions
>> went into the .syms file; I may have misunderstood.
>
> I suspect that the .syms file was introduced as a way to hide util
On 16/03/2015 17:52, Jeremy White wrote:
> It seemed as though the convention was that all non static functions
> went into the .syms file; I may have misunderstood.
I suspect that the .syms file was introduced as a way to hide utility
functions from libqemuutil.a. Now that libqemuutil is not u
Hey Marc-André,
Thanks for the review.
On 03/16/2015 11:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
>
> I have checked no regression for spice, but not the new pcsc backend.
> Do you have a spice-gtk branch or are you using vscclient only?
I'm using spice-gtk with this patch:
http://lists.fre
Hi Jeremy
I have checked no regression for spice, but not the new pcsc backend.
Do you have a spice-gtk branch or are you using vscclient only?
I would feel better note polluting more the exported symbols from
libcacard. For ex, vcard_init() and cac_card_init() are already quite
useless, since th
This series passed Patchew automatic testing, but there are some warnings.
Find the log fragments below, or open the following URL to see the full log:
http://qemu.patchew.org/testing/log/<1426275924-1904-1-git-send-email-jwh...@codeweavers.com>
--8<-
total: 0 errors, 0 warning
This is a resend of my outstanding patches, gathered together
as one series. I'm hoping to agitate for this whole set to be considered.
Changes since v2:
* Include outstanding patches not strictly related to passthru mode
* Include a fix for read binary transactions
* Mitigate some performa
