2010/6/10 Luiz Capitulino :
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>> This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
>> Migration events would be there for 0.13 until we get proper
>> async command support.
>
> Something which is not clear to me is the set of event
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
> Migration events would be there for 0.13 until we get proper
> async command support.
Something which is not clear to me is the set of events we'd have if migrate
was an async com
Hi Juan,
2010/6/9 Juan Quintela :
> This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
> Migration events would be there for 0.13 until we get proper
> async command support.
>
> Later, Juan.
>
> v3:
> - Add comment that MIGRATION_FAILURE will add a QError for 0.14
> (when we get internal su
This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
Migration events would be there for 0.13 until we get proper
async command support.
Later, Juan.
v3:
- Add comment that MIGRATION_FAILURE will add a QError for 0.14
(when we get internal support for that)
rebase against today tree
v2:
-
