Wanlong Gao writes:
> On 06/21/2013 12:02 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
>>> Il 20/06/2013 15:26, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:42AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
So, basically th
On 06/21/2013 12:02 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
>> Il 20/06/2013 15:26, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:42AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
>>> So, basically the format seemed easier to work
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 20/06/2013 15:26, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:42AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
>> So, basically the format seemed easier to work with if we are
>> thinking
>> o
Il 20/06/2013 15:26, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:42AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> So, basically the format seemed easier to work with if we are
> thinking
> of using QemuOpts for -numa. Usi
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:52:42AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> > > > So, basically the format seemed easier to work with if we are
> > > > thinking
> > > > of using QemuOpts for -numa. Using -cpu rather than cpus probably
> >
Il 20/06/2013 13:34, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
> 20.06.2013 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> libvirt uses the "cpus" option already, so we have to keep it working.
>>> Sure, we can leave it as it's now for some time while a new interface is
>>> i
20.06.2013 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
libvirt uses the "cpus" option already, so we have to keep it working.
>> Sure, we can leave it as it's now for some time while a new interface is
>> introduced/adopted. And than later deprecate "cpus".
>
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:26:42 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:42:52PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:09:49 -0400
> > Bandan Das wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This allows us to use the cpu property multiple times
> > > to specify multiple cpu (ranges) t
Il 20/06/2013 11:30, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> > > So, basically the format seemed easier to work with if we are
> > > thinking
> > > of using QemuOpts for -numa. Using -cpu rather than cpus probably
> > > makes it less ambiguous as well IMO. However, it's probably not a
>>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:42:52PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:09:49 -0400
> Bandan Das wrote:
>
> >
> > This allows us to use the cpu property multiple times
> > to specify multiple cpu (ranges) to the -numa option :
> >
> > -numa node,cpu=1,cpu=2,cpu=4
> > or
> > -num
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:09:49 -0400
Bandan Das wrote:
>
> This allows us to use the cpu property multiple times
> to specify multiple cpu (ranges) to the -numa option :
>
> -numa node,cpu=1,cpu=2,cpu=4
> or
> -numa node,cpu=1-3,cpu=5
>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das
> ---
> v3: Convert to using
This allows us to use the cpu property multiple times
to specify multiple cpu (ranges) to the -numa option :
-numa node,cpu=1,cpu=2,cpu=4
or
-numa node,cpu=1-3,cpu=5
Signed-off-by: Bandan Das
---
v3: Convert to using QemuOpts
Use -cpu rather than -cpus which probably probably makes it more
m
12 matches
Mail list logo