On 15 March 2017 at 12:49, Zhong, Yang wrote:
> So we can omit the cpu-memory address space allocated in the
> address_space_init_shareable(), which will same around 3M physical memory.
I see what you want to do...
> Maybe the below patch is much better, please help review, thanks!
>
> diff --g
Hello Peter,
The cpu-memory and memory have same address space through info mtree tool.
address-space: memory
- (prio 0, i/o): system
-7fff (prio 0, i/o): alias ram-below-4g @pc.ram
-7fff
00
On 15 March 2017 at 08:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 15/03/2017 14:39, Yang Zhong wrote:
>> Since cpu-memory and memory have same address space,one malloced
>> memory is enough. This patch will skip memory malloc for memory
>> address space,which will reduce around 3M physical memory in heap.
Hello Paolo&peter,
Maybe below patch is much more better, I also did the verification. Please all
of you give some comments, many thanks!
diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
index 64b0a60..230f2cb 100644
--- a/memory.c
+++ b/memory.c
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ AddressSpace *address_space_init_shareable(
On 15/03/2017 14:39, Yang Zhong wrote:
> Since cpu-memory and memory have same address space,one malloced
> memory is enough. This patch will skip memory malloc for memory
> address space,which will reduce around 3M physical memory in heap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong
> ---
> memory.c | 2 +-
Since cpu-memory and memory have same address space,one malloced
memory is enough. This patch will skip memory malloc for memory
address space,which will reduce around 3M physical memory in heap.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong
---
memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -
