On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:25:41AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > Current QEMU should have no restriction on parameter ordering, right?
> > Or do we have any existing case that:
> >
> > "$QEMU -parameter1 -parameter2"
> >
> > will work, while...
> >
> > "$QEMU -parameter2 -parameter1"
> >
On 03/08/2017 12:08 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2017年03月08日 16:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Apfelbaum"
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Peter Xu"
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" , "yi l liu"
, "Jintack Lim"
, "Jason Wang" , "Alex Williamson"
Sen
On 2017年03月08日 16:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Apfelbaum"
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Peter Xu"
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" , "yi l liu"
, "Jintack Lim"
, "Jason Wang" , "Alex Williamson"
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 7:24:44 AM
Subje
> Current QEMU should have no restriction on parameter ordering, right?
> Or do we have any existing case that:
>
> "$QEMU -parameter1 -parameter2"
>
> will work, while...
>
> "$QEMU -parameter2 -parameter1"
>
> won't work?
Well, we have. If you, for example, add a scsi disk, you have to
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[...]
> The ordering should be explicit in the command line. Since we do not have
> cycles, it should be possible.
Current QEMU should have no restriction on parameter ordering, right?
Or do we have any existing case that:
"$QEMU
- Original Message -
> From: "Marcel Apfelbaum"
> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Peter Xu"
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" , "yi l liu"
> , "Jintack Lim"
> , "Jason Wang" , "Alex
> Williamson"
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 7:24:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] intel_iommu:
On 03/02/2017 07:13 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:32:18AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
PCI devices (like vfio-pci, virtio-pci ones) so
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:20:53PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:13:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:32:18AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
> > > actually we need to make su
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:13:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:32:18AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
> > actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
> > PCI devices (like v
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:32:18AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
> actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
> PCI devices (like vfio-pci, virtio-pci ones) so that we know iommu_fn
> will be setup correctly
Intel vIOMMU devices are created with "-device" parameter, while here
actually we need to make sure the dmar device be created before other
PCI devices (like vfio-pci, virtio-pci ones) so that we know iommu_fn
will be setup correctly before realizations of those PCI devices (it is
legal that PCI de
11 matches
Mail list logo
