On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:28:49PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 13:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Ping? Cc:ed Anthony the maintainer of pc.c
>
> Sorry, I've been meaning to rebase this and add your reviewed-by.
>
> Would that be the right next step in this case?
>
Sorry,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 13:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Ping? Cc:ed Anthony the maintainer of pc.c
Sorry, I've been meaning to rebase this and add your reviewed-by.
Would that be the right next step in this case?
-Jordan
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:46:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On T
Ping? Cc:ed Anthony the maintainer of pc.c
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:46:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:25:26AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > If -pflash is specified and -bios is specified then pflash will
> > be mapped just below the system rom using hw/pflash_cf
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:25:26AM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> If -pflash is specified and -bios is specified then pflash will
> be mapped just below the system rom using hw/pflash_cfi01.c.
>
> If -pflash is specified on the command line, but -bios is
> not specified, then 'bios.bin' will NOT be
If -pflash is specified and -bios is specified then pflash will
be mapped just below the system rom using hw/pflash_cfi01.c.
If -pflash is specified on the command line, but -bios is
not specified, then 'bios.bin' will NOT be loaded, and
instead the -pflash flash image will be mapped just below
4G
