Hi,
Yes it's probably the cause, thanks.
On 05/07/2014 12:49 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 7 May 2014, at 09:36, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hm, but (int)res expression is not unsigned, it's signed. I've also had this
>> warning,
>> but with this expression: (res < WAIT_OBJECT_0),
On 7 May 2014, at 09:36, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hm, but (int)res expression is not unsigned, it's signed. I've also had this
> warning,
> but with this expression: (res < WAIT_OBJECT_0), that's why I put (int)
> there. Could it be that
> for some reason your compiler treats "int"
Hi,
Hm, but (int)res expression is not unsigned, it's signed. I've also had this
warning,
but with this expression: (res < WAIT_OBJECT_0), that's why I put (int) there.
Could it be that
for some reason your compiler treats "int" and "unsigned int", that would be
really strange though...
On 05/
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:24:03PM +0400, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
Please fix the following compiler warning with gcc 4.8.2:
> +} else if ((res == WAIT_TIMEOUT) || (res == WAIT_IO_COMPLETION) ||
> + ((int)res < WAIT_OBJECT_0) ||
> + (res >= (WAIT_OBJEC
Am 06.05.2014 17:49, schrieb Alex Bligh:
>
> On 6 May 2014, at 13:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> Il 06/05/2014 14:23, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Vorobiov
> ---
> include/glib-compat.h | 19 +
> include/qemu-common.h | 12 --
> util/
On 6 May 2014, at 13:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/05/2014 14:23, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>>> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Vorobiov
>>> > ---
>>> > include/glib-compat.h | 19 +
>>> > include/qemu-common.h | 12 --
>>> > util/oslib-win32.c| 112
>>> > +
Il 06/05/2014 14:23, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Vorobiov
> ---
> include/glib-compat.h | 19 +
> include/qemu-common.h | 12 --
> util/oslib-win32.c| 112
+
> 3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 12
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:24:03PM +0400, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
> From: Sangho Park
>
> g_poll has a problem on Windows when using
> timeouts < 10ms, in glib/gpoll.c:
>
> /* If not, and we have a significant timeout, poll again with
> * timeout then. Note that this will return indication fo
Il 22/04/2014 11:41, Stanislav Vorobiov ha scritto:
>m.b. it makes sense to move entire qemu_poll_ns to oslib then ? like
>this patch to oslib-win32.c and the rest of the stuff to oslib-posix.c ?
But Stefan proposed to make it this
way (which is also reasonable, since we replace buggy g_poll wit
Hi, see below
On 04/22/2014 01:21 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 22 Apr 2014, at 10:03, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
>
>>> + */
>>> +#define g_poll(fds, nfds, timeout) g_poll_fixed(fds, nfds, timeout)
>>> +gint g_poll_fixed(GPollFD *fds, guint nfds, gint timeout);
>
> I can't comment on the Windows
On 22 Apr 2014, at 10:03, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
>> + */
>> +#define g_poll(fds, nfds, timeout) g_poll_fixed(fds, nfds, timeout)
>> +gint g_poll_fixed(GPollFD *fds, guint nfds, gint timeout);
I can't comment on the Windows specific bits of this patch (though
I have commented on what needs fix
Hi everyone,
Any comments on this v3 patch ?
On 04/18/2014 08:24 PM, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
> From: Sangho Park
>
> g_poll has a problem on Windows when using
> timeouts < 10ms, in glib/gpoll.c:
>
> /* If not, and we have a significant timeout, poll again with
> * timeout then. Note that t
From: Sangho Park
g_poll has a problem on Windows when using
timeouts < 10ms, in glib/gpoll.c:
/* If not, and we have a significant timeout, poll again with
* timeout then. Note that this will return indication for only
* one event, or only for messages. We ignore timeouts less than
* ten mil
13 matches
Mail list logo
