On 01/22/19 06:36, Jon Doron wrote:
> ping, so this means that the patch will be merged in?
>
> Thanks,
> -- Jon.
Marc-André, can you please confirm if you've queued this patch for a
pull? (According to scripts/get_maintainer.pl, you are "supporter:Dump",
for both files touched by this patch.)
A
ping, so this means that the patch will be merged in?
Thanks,
-- Jon.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:38 PM Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 01/09/19 09:25, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:22 PM Jon Doron wrote:
> >>
> >> vaddr needs to be equal to the paddr since the dump file repre
On 01/09/19 09:25, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:22 PM Jon Doron wrote:
>>
>> vaddr needs to be equal to the paddr since the dump file represents the
>> physical memory image.
>>
>> Without setting vaddr correctly, GDB would load all the different memory
>> regions on top of
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:22 PM Jon Doron wrote:
>
> vaddr needs to be equal to the paddr since the dump file represents the
> physical memory image.
>
> Without setting vaddr correctly, GDB would load all the different memory
> regions on top of each other to vaddr 0, thus making GDB showing the
vaddr needs to be equal to the paddr since the dump file represents the
physical memory image.
Without setting vaddr correctly, GDB would load all the different memory
regions on top of each other to vaddr 0, thus making GDB showing the wrong
memory data for a given address.
Signed-off-by: Jon Do
