On 10/10/2016 01:27 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> C99 requires SIZE_MAX to be declared with the same type as the
> integral promotion of size_t, but OSX mistakenly defines it as
> an 'unsigned long long' expression even though size_t is only
> 'unsigned long'. Rather than futzing around with whether siz
C99 requires SIZE_MAX to be declared with the same type as the
integral promotion of size_t, but OSX mistakenly defines it as
an 'unsigned long long' expression even though size_t is only
'unsigned long'. Rather than futzing around with whether size_t
is 32- or 64-bits wide (which would be needed
