On 25.06.19 17:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 25.06.19 16:47, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
On 09.05.19 16:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> RBD APIs don't allow us to
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 25.06.19 16:47, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> >> On 09.05.19 16:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >>> RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with
> >>> rbd_cre
On 25.06.19 16:47, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 09.05.19 16:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with
>>> rbd_create() or rbd_resize().
>>> In order to support growing images (eg. qc
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:02:04PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 09.05.19 16:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with
> > rbd_create() or rbd_resize().
> > In order to support growing images (eg. qcow2), we resize the
> > image before write opera
On 09.05.19 16:59, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with
> rbd_create() or rbd_resize().
> In order to support growing images (eg. qcow2), we resize the
> image before write operations that exceed the current size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garza
RBD APIs don't allow us to write more than the size set with
rbd_create() or rbd_resize().
In order to support growing images (eg. qcow2), we resize the
image before write operations that exceed the current size.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella
---
v3:
- add 'image_size' field in the BDRVRBDS