On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
[. . .]
> And, invoking `drive-backup` *without* pre-creating the target image
> (i.e. 'incremental.o.img'):
>
> { 'execute': 'drive-backup',
> 'arguments': {
> 'device': 'ide0-0-0',
> 'bitmap': 'bitmap0
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
[. . .]
> And, invoking `drive-backup` *without* pre-creating the target image
> (i.e. 'incremental.o.img'):
>
> { 'execute': 'drive-backup',
> 'arguments': {
> 'device': 'ide0-0-0',
Small typo (in this email,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:01:10PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> I am not prepared to send a v3 on this, primarily because I am still
> waffling on whether or not to do the code motion patch that is present in
> patch #8 of v2 of this series.
>
> However, for the purposes of testing, reviewers may fin
I am not prepared to send a v3 on this, primarily because I am still
waffling on whether or not to do the code motion patch that is present
in patch #8 of v2 of this series.
However, for the purposes of testing, reviewers may find it convenient
to have a new version of this series that applies