On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> From: Blue Swirl
>>
>> Use 'bool' type for return value of bit test functions.
>
> Matter of taste. 'bool' makes sense if you think of these functions as
> predicates (ugly ones, with side effects). 'in
blauwir...@gmail.com writes:
> From: Blue Swirl
>
> Use 'bool' type for return value of bit test functions.
Matter of taste. 'bool' makes sense if you think of these functions as
predicates (ugly ones, with side effects). 'int' makes sense if you
think of them as returning the bit value (a bit
On 8 July 2012 20:22, wrote:
> From: Blue Swirl
>
> Use 'bool' type for return value of bit test functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
I'm 'meh' about the necessity for this change, but it looks safe
and functionally correct to me -- all these functions are either
already returning the resu
From: Blue Swirl
Use 'bool' type for return value of bit test functions.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
---
bitops.h |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bitops.h b/bitops.h
index bc99727..1cecf00 100644
--- a/bitops.h
+++ b/bitops.h
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ st
