David Gibson writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:20:10AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/25/2016 11:26 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> > All the variants for rol/ror have a bug in case where the shift == 0.
>> > For example rol32, would generate:
>> >
>>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:20:10AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 11:26 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > All the variants for rol/ror have a bug in case where the shift == 0.
> > For example rol32, would generate:
> >
> > return (word << 0) | (word >> 32);
> >
> > Which thoug
On 10/25/2016 11:26 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> All the variants for rol/ror have a bug in case where the shift == 0.
> For example rol32, would generate:
>
> return (word << 0) | (word >> 32);
>
> Which though works, would be flagged as a runtime error on clang's
> sanitizer.
>
> Suggest
All the variants for rol/ror have a bug in case where the shift == 0.
For example rol32, would generate:
return (word << 0) | (word >> 32);
Which though works, would be flagged as a runtime error on clang's
sanitizer.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania
---
in
