On 05/05/2013 01:34 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.05.2013 05:14, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
wrote:
diff --git a/hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c b/hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..5b0d046
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c
[...]
On 05/05/2013 01:53 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 5 May 2013 11:53, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 5 May 2013 04:58, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
no extract16() macro spott
Hi Peter,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 May 2013 11:53, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 5 May 2013 04:58, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
no extract16() macro spotted.
Should one be added?
>>>
>>>
On 5 May 2013 11:53, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 5 May 2013 04:58, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
>>> no extract16() macro spotted.
>>> Should one be added?
>>
>> There's no need for one -- just use extract32. The only
>> reason for hav
Am 05.05.2013 05:14, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
> wrote:
>> diff --git a/hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c b/hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..5b0d046
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c
[...]
>> +typedef struct imx_i2c_state
Hi Peter,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 May 2013 04:58, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
>> On 05/05/2013 05:14 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> You could use an extract macro. extract32 is generally considered
>>> better than shift and & logicvfor multi-bit fields. Il
On 5 May 2013 04:58, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
> On 05/05/2013 05:14 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> You could use an extract macro. extract32 is generally considered
>> better than shift and & logicvfor multi-bit fields. Ill have to look
>> up if extract16 exists (im away from tree for this r
On 05/05/2013 05:14 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi JC,
Thanks for actioning the comments.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
wrote:
The slave mode is not implemented.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
---
As a general rule you need to indicate changes between the
Hi JC,
Thanks for actioning the comments.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
wrote:
> The slave mode is not implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
> ---
As a general rule you need to indicate changes between the last
version and this version (changlog). My
The slave mode is not implemented.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
---
default-configs/arm-softmmu.mak | 2 +
hw/i2c/Makefile.objs| 1 +
hw/i2c/imx_i2c.c| 383
include/hw/arm/imx.h| 1 +
4 files changed,
10 matches
Mail list logo