On 11/19/2015 09:33 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:10:06AM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> From: Gu Zheng
>>
>> In order to deal well with the kvm vcpus (which can not be removed without
>> any
>> protection), we do not close KVM vcpu fd, just record and mark it as stopped
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:10:06AM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> From: Gu Zheng
>
> In order to deal well with the kvm vcpus (which can not be removed without any
> protection), we do not close KVM vcpu fd, just record and mark it as stopped
> into a list, so that we can reuse it for the appendi
From: Gu Zheng
In order to deal well with the kvm vcpus (which can not be removed without any
protection), we do not close KVM vcpu fd, just record and mark it as stopped
into a list, so that we can reuse it for the appending cpu hot-add request if
possible. It is also the approach that kvm guys
