On 7 May 2013 01:39, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> There may also be cases where machine model want to create a NIC
> regardless of whether its used or not. Relevant for sysbus NICs as we
> don't have the luxury of a PCI probe process so a generic guest (e.g.
> a kernel and its pre-canned dtb) may as
Hi Peter, Michael,
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 May 2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:08:42AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 6 May 2013 09:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:00:24PM +0100, Peter Ma
On 6 May 2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:08:42AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 6 May 2013 09:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:00:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 5 May 2013 22:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> > On Su
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:08:42AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> [cc'd Anthony since this has drifted into a more general topic]
>
> On 6 May 2013 09:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:00:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 5 May 2013 22:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrot
[cc'd Anthony since this has drifted into a more general topic]
On 6 May 2013 09:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:00:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 May 2013 22:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 07:01:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:00:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 May 2013 22:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 07:01:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Sorry, you can't say this until we've sorted out the mess
> >> that is new-style networking options in a machine w
On 5 May 2013 22:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 07:01:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Sorry, you can't say this until we've sorted out the mess
>> that is new-style networking options in a machine which
>> creates embedded network controllers.
> What is missing exactl
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 07:01:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 May 2013 18:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Let's not bother with legacy -net support
> > for new devices.
> >
> > Anyone who wants it can create it with the new style
> > -device flag.
>
> Sorry, you can't say this until we'
On 5 May 2013 18:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Let's not bother with legacy -net support
> for new devices.
>
> Anyone who wants it can create it with the new style
> -device flag.
Sorry, you can't say this until we've sorted out the mess
that is new-style networking options in a machine which
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
> This is based on the mcf_fec.c FEC implementation for ColdFire.
>
> * a generic phy was added (borrowed from lan9118).
> * The buffer management is also modified as buffers are
> slightly different between cold
On 05/05/2013 03:31 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.05.2013 15:14, schrieb Jean-Christophe DUBOIS:
On 05/05/2013 05:11 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi JC,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
wrote:
This is based on the mcf_fec.c FEC implementation for ColdFire.
Note tha
Am 05.05.2013 15:14, schrieb Jean-Christophe DUBOIS:
> On 05/05/2013 05:11 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> Hi JC,
>>
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
>> wrote:
>>> This is based on the mcf_fec.c FEC implementation for ColdFire.
Note that ColdFire is one of the least mai
On 05/05/2013 05:11 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi JC,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
wrote:
This is based on the mcf_fec.c FEC implementation for ColdFire.
* a generic phy was added (borrowed from lan9118).
* The buffer management is also modified as buff
On 5 May 2013 12:59, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> While your here I have an on topic question, do we want creation
> helpers like this? I notice that we progressively moving towards the
> state where machine models talk to QOM directly without wrapper init
> fns such as this.. Are functions like thi
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.05.2013 05:11, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
>> wrote:
>>> +void imx_fec_create(int nic, const hwaddr base, qemu_irq irq)
>>
>> does this compile with Werror? I thoug
Am 05.05.2013 05:11, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
> wrote:
>> +void imx_fec_create(int nic, const hwaddr base, qemu_irq irq)
>
> does this compile with Werror? I thought there was a requirement that
> all non-static functions must have a fn
Hi JC,
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
wrote:
> This is based on the mcf_fec.c FEC implementation for ColdFire.
>
> * a generic phy was added (borrowed from lan9118).
> * The buffer management is also modified as buffers are
> slightly different between coldf
This is based on the mcf_fec.c FEC implementation for ColdFire.
* a generic phy was added (borrowed from lan9118).
* The buffer management is also modified as buffers are
slightly different between coldfire and i.MX.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
---
default-configs/arm-so
18 matches
Mail list logo
