"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> There is no reason for having the loadvm_handlers at all. There is
>> only one use, and we can use the savevm handlers.
>>
>> We will remove the loadvm handlers on a following patch.
>
>
>
>> trace_qemu_loadv
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> There is no reason for having the loadvm_handlers at all. There is
> only one use, and we can use the savevm handlers.
>
> We will remove the loadvm handlers on a following patch.
> trace_qemu_loadvm_state_section_partend(section_id);
> -
On 30/05/2017 10:37, Juan Quintela wrote:
> There is no reason for having the loadvm_handlers at all. There is
> only one use, and we can use the savevm handlers.
>
> We will remove the loadvm handlers on a following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier
> ---
>
There is no reason for having the loadvm_handlers at all. There is
only one use, and we can use the savevm handlers.
We will remove the loadvm handlers on a following patch.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
migration/savevm.c | 29 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
