On 02/22/2016 06:34 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.02.2016 um 10:02 hat Dr. David Alan Gilbert geschrieben:
* Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang wro
On 02/22/2016 06:31 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> The way I see it is that if we have, say, 5 drives with a threshold of 3
> and flushing fails in one of them Quorum should report the error (with
> QUORUM_REPORT_BAD probably, or maybe a new event) but succeed, because
> we have at least 3 images tha
On Mon 22 Feb 2016 02:31:30 PM CET, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> Anyway, regardless of that, if we do take the threshold into account,
>> we should not use the exact error value for voting but just whether
>> an error occurred or not. If all but one children fail to flush (all
>> for different reasons)
On Sat 20 Feb 2016 03:28:03 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
>> That said, I'm not very convinced of the current logics of the Quorum
>> flush code either, so it's not even a problem with your patch... it
>> seems to me that the code should follow the same logics as in the
>> read/write case: if the numb
* Kevin Wolf (kw...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Am 22.02.2016 um 10:02 hat Dr. David Alan Gilbert geschrieben:
> > * Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> > > On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > >On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > > >>On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET,
Am 22.02.2016 um 10:02 hat Dr. David Alan Gilbert geschrieben:
> * Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> > On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> > >On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > >>On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >If q
* Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 05:02 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >* Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> >>On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> >>>On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen
On 02/22/2016 05:02 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang wrote:
If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush s
* Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> >On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> >>On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B
> >flush fail
On 02/20/2016 10:28 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang wrote:
If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B
flush failed. We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick
anyone of them. Otherwise
On 19.02.2016 12:24, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang wrote:
>
If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B
flush failed. We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick
anyone of them. Otherwise the filesystem of guest w
On Fri 19 Feb 2016 09:26:53 AM CET, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B
>>> flush failed. We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick
>>> anyone of them. Otherwise the filesystem of guest will become
>>> read-only with following errors:
>>
On 02/18/2016 11:16 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Tue 16 Feb 2016 03:15:44 AM CET, Changlong Xie
> wrote:
>> If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B flush
>> failed. We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick anyone of
>> them. Otherwise the filesystem of guest wil
On Tue 16 Feb 2016 03:15:44 AM CET, Changlong Xie
wrote:
> If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B flush
> failed. We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick anyone of
> them. Otherwise the filesystem of guest will become read-only with
> following errors:
>
> end_r
* Changlong Xie (xiecl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B flush failed.
> We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick anyone of them. Otherwise
> the filesystem of guest will become read-only with following errors:
>
> end_request: I/
If quorum has two children(A, B). A do flush sucessfully, but B flush failed.
We MUST choice A as winner rather than just pick anyone of them. Otherwise
the filesystem of guest will become read-only with following errors:
end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 11159960
Aborting journal on device
16 matches
Mail list logo
