On 3/14/19 2:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 3/14/19 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:55:19PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> static void make_challenge(VncState *vs)
>>> {
>>> -int i;
>>> -
>>> -srand(time(NULL)+getpid()+getpid()*987654+rand(
On 3/14/19 4:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:55:19PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Use a better interface for random numbers than rand,
>> plus some useless floating point arithmetic.
>>
>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
>> ---
>> v2: Use
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:55:19PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Use a better interface for random numbers than rand,
> plus some useless floating point arithmetic.
>
> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> v2: Use qcrypto_random_bytes, not qemu_getrandom, as there is
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:55:19PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Use a better interface for random numbers than rand,
> plus some useless floating point arithmetic.
>
> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann
Use a better interface for random numbers than rand,
plus some useless floating point arithmetic.
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
v2: Use qcrypto_random_bytes, not qemu_getrandom, as there is
no need for deterministic results for this interface.
---
ui/vnc.c | 8 ++---
