On 20 May 2014 16:43, Greg Bellows wrote:
> My focus within Linaro is to add support for the security extension to qemu
> for ARMv7. Given that we both started from Samsung's original patches our
> code is fairly similar. However, it appears that your changes have also
> incorporated some ARMv8
On 16 May 2014 21:56, Greg Bellows wrote:
> Overview:
> The approach delicately hashes all the SP registers just as Fabian's
> approach does. The primary difference is that all the existing ARMCPRegInfo
> entries are left as-is and are blindly registered for both NS-bit settings
> (encoded in the
Hi Greg
Thanks for sharing your approach. I like your idea of keeping the hashtable
small when Security Extensions are not present as well as isolating Sec-Ext
specific registers in their own group. How do you want to proceed in this
matter? Are you going to continue working on the banking and
Yes, sorry about that.
Best,
Fabian
> On 15.05.2014, at 20:58, "Sergey Fedorov" wrote:
>
> Can s.fedo...@samsung.com be removed from CC list since this mailbox has
> been deleted? That was my address when I worked for Samsung. Now sending
> to this address results with annoying delivery failur
Can s.fedo...@samsung.com be removed from CC list since this mailbox has
been deleted? That was my address when I worked for Samsung. Now sending
to this address results with annoying delivery failure notification.
Thanks,
Sergey.
13.05.2014 20:15, Fabian Aggeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a rework
Hi,
This is a rework of the Samsung patches sent last year to add Security
Extensions. The patches have been changed based on the discussion on
the mailing list. Other changes became necessary because of Aarch64
support which got added in the meantime. This patchset makes it possible
to run a ker
