On 06/05/2017 03:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> ping
>
ACK.
> On 05/10/2017 09:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
>> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
>> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or
ping
On 05/10/2017 09:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
> much higher levels). I've therefore started the tas
There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of
converting our block status code to report at a byt
