On 26/11/18 15:11, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 11/15/18 5:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Corey,
>>
>> On 15/11/18 20:24, miny...@acm.org wrote:
>>> These changes allow SMBus access while doing a state transfer.
>>> Seems like a good idea to me in general.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm primarily sub
On 11/15/18 5:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Corey,
On 15/11/18 20:24, miny...@acm.org wrote:
These changes allow SMBus access while doing a state transfer.
Seems like a good idea to me in general.
I'm primarily submitting this to make sure I'm doing the backwards
compatability with
On 11/15/18 5:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Corey,
On 15/11/18 20:24, miny...@acm.org wrote:
These changes allow SMBus access while doing a state transfer.
Seems like a good idea to me in general.
I have these queued for the SMBus IPMI driver work, of course.
I had submitted this be
Hi Corey,
On 15/11/18 20:24, miny...@acm.org wrote:
These changes allow SMBus access while doing a state transfer.
Seems like a good idea to me in general.
I have these queued for the SMBus IPMI driver work, of course.
I had submitted this before and then lost track of the work since I
started
These changes allow SMBus access while doing a state transfer.
Seems like a good idea to me in general.
I have these queued for the SMBus IPMI driver work, of course.
I had submitted this before and then lost track of the work since I
started finding all kinds of broken things in the I2C code. I
