On 26 January 2015 at 11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/01/2015 11:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Ping for review of this v2 (for code, if you like, but primarily
>> for methodology and sanity of the relicensing; we can always fix
>> code bugs later).
>
> For the method and sanity:
>
> Reviewed-by:
On 26 January 2015 at 11:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 26/01/2015 11:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Ping for review of this v2 (for code, if you like, but primarily
>> for methodology and sanity of the relicensing; we can always fix
>> code bugs later).
>
> For the method and sanity:
>
> Reviewed
On 26/01/2015 11:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Ping for review of this v2 (for code, if you like, but primarily
> for methodology and sanity of the relicensing; we can always fix
> code bugs later).
For the method and sanity:
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
I'm still fairly sure that RH changes can b
Ping for review of this v2 (for code, if you like, but primarily
for methodology and sanity of the relicensing; we can always fix
code bugs later).
We really need to get this sorted out for the next release.
I am very strongly tempted to say that I'm just going to stop
processing pull requests unt
Hi; as you may be aware, we discovered some time back that
the license of SoftFloat-2b is claimed to be GPLv2 incompatible by
the FSF due to an indemnification clause. The previous release,
SoftFloat-2a, did not contain this clause. We're therefore switching
to the -2a release and relicensing (or
