Hello Max,
This series strips down my Xtensa QOM'ification patch from the qom-cpu-others.v1
RFC series, avoiding the XtensaConfig vs. subclass problem and taking care
not to introduce "klass", including in the header file.
I've tested this with the dc232b semihosting test image.
Please review a
>> This series strips down my Xtensa QOM'ification patch from the
>> qom-cpu-others.v1
>> RFC series, avoiding the XtensaConfig vs. subclass problem and taking care
>> not to introduce "klass", including in the header file.
>>
>> I've tested this with the dc232b semihosting test image.
>
> BTW, is
Am 11.04.2012 18:24, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Hello Max,
>
> This series strips down my Xtensa QOM'ification patch from the
> qom-cpu-others.v1
> RFC series, avoiding the XtensaConfig vs. subclass problem and taking care
> not to introduce "klass", including in the header file.
>
> I've tested
Hello Max,
This series strips down my Xtensa QOM'ification patch from the qom-cpu-others.v1
RFC series, avoiding the XtensaConfig vs. subclass problem and taking care
not to introduce "klass", including in the header file.
I've tested this with the dc232b semihosting test image.
Please review an
