On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:05:47PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> >When we iterate the memory-device list to
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not
>> >necessary to iterate the w
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not
> >necessary to iterate the whole list.
> >
> >1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it
>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not
>necessary to iterate the whole list.
>
>1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it
>
>v2:
> * remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David
> * add some
When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not
necessary to iterate the whole list.
1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it
v2:
* remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David
* add some comment to inform address assignment stay the same as before
