On 2013-02-23 15:40, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 23.02.2013 15:29, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2013-02-23 15:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 23.02.2013 15:02, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
Will address the QOM changes, but I need to check back with
$customer regarding test suite efforts.
>>>
>>> Than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.02.2013 15:29, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2013-02-23 15:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 23.02.2013 15:02, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>> Will address the QOM changes, but I need to check back with
>>> $customer regarding test suite efforts.
>>
>> Thanks.
On 2013-02-23 15:08, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 23.02.2013 15:02, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> On 2013-02-23 14:12, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 22.02.2013 21:39, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
Rebased over current master, resolved new reports of
checkpatch.
>>>
>>> This doesn't really take all developmen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.02.2013 15:02, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 2013-02-23 14:12, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 22.02.2013 21:39, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>> Rebased over current master, resolved new reports of
>>> checkpatch.
>>
>> This doesn't really take all developments
On 2013-02-23 14:12, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 22.02.2013 21:39, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> Rebased over current master, resolved new reports of checkpatch.
>
> This doesn't really take all developments in master into account,
> comments on 2/2.
Yeah, that happens if such patches wait too long for b
Am 22.02.2013 21:39, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> Rebased over current master, resolved new reports of checkpatch.
This doesn't really take all developments in master into account,
comments on 2/2.
Andreas
>
> See patches for details.
>
> Jan Kiszka (2):
> i2c: Introduce device address mask
> Add
Rebased over current master, resolved new reports of checkpatch.
See patches for details.
Jan Kiszka (2):
i2c: Introduce device address mask
Add AT24Cxx I2C EEPROM device model
hw/Makefile.objs |2 +-
hw/at24.c| 363 ++
hw/ds1
