On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 00:01 +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 20:19 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:15:00PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 18:51 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:12:25
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 20:19 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:15:00PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 18:51 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:12:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:15:00PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 18:51 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:12:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 05:58:09PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-12-26
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 18:51 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:12:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 05:58:09PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 17:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:12:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 05:58:09PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 17:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-12-26
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 05:58:09PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 17:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 15:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 0
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 17:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 15:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 14:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:09:58PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 15:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 14:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 0
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 15:53 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 14:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > Acpi unit-test will fail
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 14:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > Acpi unit-test will fail every time the acpi tables change.
> > >
> > > The series adds a scr
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 14:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > Acpi unit-test will fail every time the acpi tables change.
> >
> > The series adds a script that rebuilds the expected aml files, so the test
> > will pass. It also
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Acpi unit-test will fail every time the acpi tables change.
>
> The series adds a script that rebuilds the expected aml files, so the test
> will pass. It also validates the modifications.
>
> The acpi unit test will rebuild the
Acpi unit-test will fail every time the acpi tables change.
The series adds a script that rebuilds the expected aml files, so the test
will pass. It also validates the modifications.
The acpi unit test will rebuild the aml tables if TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML
environment variable is set.
v1 -> v2:
Ad
13 matches
Mail list logo