On 02/12/2018 09:07 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
Is xxd now considered a common enough tool for portable scripts? I've
always liked xxd for manual use, but scripted with 'od'.
This script isn't part of a normal build or make check or anything, so
jumping through hoops to make it portable
On 02/12/2018 09:07 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:18:46PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
>>> diff --git a/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
>>> b/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
>>> new fil
* Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:18:46PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > diff --git a/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
> > b/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00..c40f025e1a
> > --- /dev
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:18:46PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> diff --git a/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
> b/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 00..c40f025e1a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/migration/rebuild-x86-bootblock.sh
On 02/05/2018 12:18 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> The boot block used in the migration test is currently only
> shipped as a hex (with the source in the git commit message),
> change this to actually include the source.
>
> A script is added to re
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
The boot block used in the migration test is currently only
shipped as a hex (with the source in the git commit message),
change this to actually include the source.
A script is added to rebuild the header but the expectation is that
the generated hex is shipped as
