On 18.11.2013, at 03:55, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 06:18 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM
On 11/12/2013 06:18 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Ale
On 11/09/2013 11:20 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>>> On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> So far POWER7+ was a part of POWE
On 11/09/2013 03:59 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>> On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value
Am 08.11.2013 15:54, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>>> So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
>>> PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separat
On 11/09/2013 12:44 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>> So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
>> PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
>> family class.
>>
>
> Alexey,
>
>> Another reason
Am 08.11.2013 03:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
> PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
> family class.
>
Alexey,
> Another reason to make a POWER7+ family is that its name in the device
>
So far POWER7+ was a part of POWER7 family. However it has a different
PVR base value so in order to support PVR masks, it needs a separate
family class.
Another reason to make a POWER7+ family is that its name in the device
tree (/proc/device-tree/cpus/cpu*) should be "Power7+" but not "Power7"
a