On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Johannes Winter
wrote:
> On 07.12.2012 15:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
> [...]
>
>> On 7 December 2012 14:31, Daniel Sangorrin
>> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
>>> In particular, I'm interested in helping to make current TrustZone
>>> support by Johannes Winter
>>> (https://git
On 07.12.2012 15:38, Peter Maydell wrote:
[...]
On 7 December 2012 14:31, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> [...]
In particular, I'm interested in helping to make current TrustZone
support by Johannes Winter
(https://github.com/jowinter/qemu-trustzone) mainstream. I can
contribute by testing it or add
On 7 December 2012 14:31, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> Thanks for your kind explanation. I will fix the patch and send it
> again next Monday (hopefully I won't make any mistake this time). And
> yes, I would like to collaborate with more patches in the future so it
> might be good practice.
OK, coo
Peter,
Thanks for your kind explanation. I will fix the patch and send it
again next Monday (hopefully I won't make any mistake this time). And
yes, I would like to collaborate with more patches in the future so it
might be good practice.
In particular, I'm interested in helping to make current T
On 7 December 2012 08:07, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> Sorry, it seems that I did not understand the flow in the function
> "hw/arm_gic.c:gic_dist_writeb()" and made some mistaken assumptions in
> my previous patch. Please do not apply the previous patch, and apply
> this one instead if you consider
Sorry, it seems that I did not understand the flow in the function
"hw/arm_gic.c:gic_dist_writeb()" and made some mistaken assumptions in
my previous patch. Please do not apply the previous patch, and apply
this one instead if you consider that it is correct.
target-arm: fix bug in irq value on ar
