On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:28:46AM -0500, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> The x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features() returns a list
> of unavailable features compared to the host CPU. Currently it may
> return empty strings for unnamed features as well as duplicated
> names.
>
> For example,
On 12/11/18 1:47 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
Yes, it helped a lot, thanks. And I apologize for my mistake, I'm gonna
send a v3 fixing it.
You may want to wait a day or so for any other comments on v2, to
minimize the resend churn. A maintainer can fix up tags, particularly
when
On 12/11/2018 03:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/11/18 10:28 AM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
The x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features() returns a list
of unavailable features compared to the host CPU. Currently it may
return empty strings for unnamed features as well as duplicated
names.
On 12/11/18 10:28 AM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
The x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features() returns a list
of unavailable features compared to the host CPU. Currently it may
return empty strings for unnamed features as well as duplicated
names.
For example, the qmp "query-cpu-definitions
The x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features() returns a list
of unavailable features compared to the host CPU. Currently it may
return empty strings for unnamed features as well as duplicated
names.
For example, the qmp "query-cpu-definitions" below shows one empty
string and repeated "mpx" entries:
