On 09/14/2012 03:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
On 13/09/12 20:29, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
Regarding migration: do we migrate the NetClient->link_down field? If
we only migrate the status registe
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
> On 13/09/12 20:29, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
>> Regarding migration: do we migrate the NetClient->link_down field? If
>> we only migrate the status register value then the link may actually
>>
On 13/09/12 20:29, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
From: Jason Wang
Add a link status chang callback and change the link status bit in BMSR
& MSR accordingly. Tested in Linux/Windows guests.
The link status bit of MediaStatus is infered from BasicMode
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Amos Kong wrote:
> From: Jason Wang
>
> Add a link status chang callback and change the link status bit in BMSR
> & MSR accordingly. Tested in Linux/Windows guests.
>
> The link status bit of MediaStatus is infered from BasicModeStatus,
> they are reverse.
>
> Sig
From: Jason Wang
Add a link status chang callback and change the link status bit in BMSR
& MSR accordingly. Tested in Linux/Windows guests.
The link status bit of MediaStatus is infered from BasicModeStatus,
they are reverse.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
Signed-off-by: Amos Kong
---
v2: don't a