Hi,
On 07/02/18 10:56, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:39:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
>>> priority order:
>>>
>>> IOMMU > PCI Devices
>>>
>>> When
* Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:39:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> > priority order:
> >
> > IOMMU > PCI Devices
> >
> > When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and a pcie-root-port
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:39:33PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> priority order:
>
> IOMMU > PCI Devices
>
> When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and a pcie-root-port, we'll
> always migrate vIOMMU first, since pci buses will
On 06/02/2018 9:39, Peter Xu wrote:
> In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> priority order:
>
> IOMMU > PCI Devices
>
> When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and a pcie-root-port, we'll
> always migrate vIOMMU first, since pci buses will be seen to have the
>
In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
priority order:
IOMMU > PCI Devices
When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and a pcie-root-port, we'll
always migrate vIOMMU first, since pci buses will be seen to have the
same priority of general PCI devices.
That's proble
