On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:48:45PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.04.2013 13:31, schrieb edgar.igles...@gmail.com:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> >
> > Configurable at CPU synthesis/instantiation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
> > ---
> >
> > Peter Crosthwaite commen
Hi,
Am 24.04.2013 13:31, schrieb edgar.igles...@gmail.com:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
>
> Configurable at CPU synthesis/instantiation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
> ---
>
> Peter Crosthwaite commented off-list that it would be a good idea
> to make this a device property. I agree bu
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:31 PM, wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
>
> Configurable at CPU synthesis/instantiation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite
> ---
>
> Peter Crosthwaite commented off-list that it would be a good idea
> to make this a device propert
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
Configurable at CPU synthesis/instantiation.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
---
Peter Crosthwaite commented off-list that it would be a good idea
to make this a device property. I agree but am a bit unsure of
how it should look. Any comments on this attempt?
v2:
Ma
