On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> @@ -6421,11 +6597,13 @@ static void handle_pending_signal(CPUArchState
>> *cpu_env, int sig,
>> || defined(TARGET_NIOS2)
>> /* These targets do not have traditional signals. */
>> setup_rt_frame(sig, sa, &k->inf
Le 26/02/2017 à 13:39, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 26 February 2017 at 12:29, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 26/02/2017 à 00:04, Pranith Kumar a écrit :
>>> Note that x86_64 has only _rt signal handlers. This implementation
>>> attempts to share code with the x86_32 implementation.
>
>>> +struc
On 26 February 2017 at 12:29, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 26/02/2017 à 00:04, Pranith Kumar a écrit :
>> Note that x86_64 has only _rt signal handlers. This implementation
>> attempts to share code with the x86_32 implementation.
>> +struct target_fpreg st[8];
>
> Why don't you keep the origin
Le 26/02/2017 à 00:04, Pranith Kumar a écrit :
> Note that x86_64 has only _rt signal handlers. This implementation
> attempts to share code with the x86_32 implementation.
>
> CC: Laurent Vivier
> Signed-off-by: Allan Wirth
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar
> ---
>
Note that x86_64 has only _rt signal handlers. This implementation
attempts to share code with the x86_32 implementation.
CC: Laurent Vivier
Signed-off-by: Allan Wirth
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar
---
v2: Update with review comments from Laurent Vivier
---
linux-us
