Laszlo Ersek writes:
> On 12/03/13 18:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster
>
> My horse for a commit, please?
Your horse, two months, and four more rebases.
On 12/03/13 18:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster
My horse for a commit, please?
Thanks
Laszlo
On 12/03/13 18:23, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek writes:
>
>> This patch allows the user to usefully specify
>>
>> -drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
>> -drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
>>
>> on the command line. The flash images will be mapped under 4G in their
Il 03/12/2013 18:23, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> > +/* push a new, "none" location on the location stack;
>> > overwrite its
>> > + * contents with the location saved in the option; print the
>> > error
>> > + * (includes location); pop the top
>> > +
Laszlo Ersek writes:
> This patch allows the user to usefully specify
>
> -drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
> -drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
>
> on the command line. The flash images will be mapped under 4G in their
> reverse unit order -- that is, with their base addr
This patch allows the user to usefully specify
-drive file=img_1,if=pflash,format=raw,readonly \
-drive file=img_2,if=pflash,format=raw
on the command line. The flash images will be mapped under 4G in their
reverse unit order -- that is, with their base addresses progressing
downwards, in inc
