Am 18.11.2012 22:09, schrieb Blue Swirl:
Thanks, applied.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Weak symbols were a nice idea, but they turned out not to be a good one.
Toolchain support is just too sparse, in particular llvm-gcc is totally
broken.
This patch uses a surpri
Thanks, applied.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Weak symbols were a nice idea, but they turned out not to be a good one.
> Toolchain support is just too sparse, in particular llvm-gcc is totally
> broken.
>
> This patch uses a surprisingly low-tech approach: a static libr
Am 18.11.2012 17:10, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 16/11/2012 19:18, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 16 November 2012 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Weak symbols were a nice idea, but they turned out not to be a good one.
Toolchain support is just too sparse, in particular llvm-gcc is totally
Il 16/11/2012 19:18, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 16 November 2012 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Weak symbols were a nice idea, but they turned out not to be a good one.
>> Toolchain support is just too sparse, in particular llvm-gcc is totally
>> broken.
>>
>> This patch uses a surprisingly lo
On 16 November 2012 17:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Weak symbols were a nice idea, but they turned out not to be a good one.
> Toolchain support is just too sparse, in particular llvm-gcc is totally
> broken.
>
> This patch uses a surprisingly low-tech approach: a static library.
> Symbols in a stat
Weak symbols were a nice idea, but they turned out not to be a good one.
Toolchain support is just too sparse, in particular llvm-gcc is totally
broken.
This patch uses a surprisingly low-tech approach: a static library.
Symbols in a static library are always overridden by symbols in an
object fil
