Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/12/2015 08:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
>>> if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
>>> contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less c
On 11/12/2015 08:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
>> if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
>> contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less code,
>> reflect the determin
Eric Blake writes:
> None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
> if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
> contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less code,
> reflect the determined boolean value back to the caller instead
> of making t
None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less code,
reflect the determined boolean value back to the caller instead
of making the caller read the boolean afte