On 05/17/2012 12:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 08:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 05/16/2012 11:04 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>>
> +- "value": cache size in bytes (json-int)
Would it be any easier to take 'order' (log2 of the size) instead of the
actual cache size? That
On 05/16/2012 08:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 11:04 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>
> >>> +- "value": cache size in bytes (json-int)
> >>
> >> Would it be any easier to take 'order' (log2 of the size) instead of the
> >> actual cache size? That is, instead of calling "value":1048576, I wou
On 05/16/2012 05:59 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> Change XBZRLE cache size in bytes (the size should be a power of 2).
> If XBZRLE cache size is too small there will be many cache miss.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Hudzia
> Signed-off-by: Petter Svard
> Signed-off-by: Aidan Shribman
> Signed-off-by:
On 05/16/2012 11:04 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>>> +- "value": cache size in bytes (json-int)
>>
>> Would it be any easier to take 'order' (log2 of the size) instead of the
>> actual cache size? That is, instead of calling "value":1048576, I would
>> rather type "value":20.
> Well the user is cons
On 05/16/2012 07:45 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 05:59 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>> Change XBZRLE cache size in bytes (the size should be a power of 2).
>> If XBZRLE cache size is too small there will be many cache miss.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Hudzia
>> Signed-off-by: Petter Svard
>
Change XBZRLE cache size in bytes (the size should be a power of 2).
If XBZRLE cache size is too small there will be many cache miss.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Hudzia
Signed-off-by: Petter Svard
Signed-off-by: Aidan Shribman
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman
---
arch_init.c |7 +++
hmp-c
