Le 19/06/2019 à 14:12, Aleksandar Rikalo a écrit :
> Hi Laurent,
...
>> BTW, do we really need to emulate the syscall if it is not available?
>>
>> I think the user-space application calling statx() should be ready to
>> receive ENOSYS and define some kinds of fallback (like you do below). So
>> it
Hi Laurent,
> s/arhitecture/architecture/
Done.
> You should define sys_statx() using _syscall5() macro and use it.
Done.
> ret != -TARGET_ENOSYS
Done.
> You already checked above p is not NULL and exited with -TARGET_EFAULT.
Done.
> BTW, do we really need to emulate the syscall if it is n
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:13 PM Aleksandar Markovic
wrote:
> I am waiting on him to send a new version of the series. Meanwhile you can
> send strace patch to the list, and I can even incude it in my series after
> and together with Aleksandar's patch, if you don't object.
I submitted it the us
On Wednesday, June 19, 2019, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On 6/7/19 3:35 AM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>
>> Implement support for translation of system call statx().
>>
>
> I also need these patches for 32-bit RISC-V linux user mode support.
>
> glibc ld.so calls statx if fstatat is not supported. Appar
On 6/7/19 3:35 AM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
Implement support for translation of system call statx().
I also need these patches for 32-bit RISC-V linux user mode support.
glibc ld.so calls statx if fstatat is not supported. Apparently new
linux architecture ports aren't allowed to define _
Le 07/06/2019 à 12:35, Aleksandar Markovic a écrit :
> From: Aleksandar Rikalo
>
> Implement support for translation of system call statx().
>
> The implementation is based on "best effort" approach: if host is
> capable of executing statx(), host statx() is used. If not, the
> implementation in
From: Aleksandar Rikalo
Implement support for translation of system call statx().
The implementation is based on "best effort" approach: if host is
capable of executing statx(), host statx() is used. If not, the
implementation includes invoking other (more mature) system calls
(from the same 'st
