Eric Blake writes:
> On 10/26/2015 11:07 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
>>> 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
>>> C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
>>> 2) The C st
On 10/26/2015 11:07 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
>> 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
>> C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
>> 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union,
Eric Blake writes:
> We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
> 1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
> C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
> 2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
> values in the same namespace as a
We have two issues with our qapi union layout:
1) Even though the QMP wire format spells the tag 'type', the
C code spells it 'kind', requiring some hacks in the generator.
2) The C struct uses an anonymous union, which places all tag
values in the same namespace as all non-variant members. This
le
