On 11/06/2015 09:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> On 11/06/2015 08:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Eric Blake writes:
>>>
By moving err into data, we can let test teardown take care
of cleaning up any collected error; it also gives us fewer
lines of co
Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/06/2015 08:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> By moving err into data, we can let test teardown take care
>>> of cleaning up any collected error; it also gives us fewer
>>> lines of code between repeated tests where init runs teardown
>>> on
On 11/06/2015 08:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> By moving err into data, we can let test teardown take care
>> of cleaning up any collected error; it also gives us fewer
>> lines of code between repeated tests where init runs teardown
>> on our behalf.
>
> I think this
Eric Blake writes:
> By moving err into data, we can let test teardown take care
> of cleaning up any collected error; it also gives us fewer
> lines of code between repeated tests where init runs teardown
> on our behalf.
I think this paragraph is no longer valid: you aren't moving err
anywhere
By moving err into data, we can let test teardown take care
of cleaning up any collected error; it also gives us fewer
lines of code between repeated tests where init runs teardown
on our behalf.
Rather than duplicate code between .c files, I added a new
test-qmp-common.h. I debated about putting
