On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 05:29:39PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> > On 06/13/2017 02:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I think that it would make things clearer if we do a s/copied/received/
> >> As what we are tracking here a
Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 02:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Alexey Perevalov wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I think that it would make things clearer if we do a s/copied/received/
>> As what we are tracking here are the pages that have already been
>> received.
>>
>>
>>> This patch adds abil
On 06/13/2017 02:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Alexey Perevalov wrote:
Hi
I think that it would make things clearer if we do a s/copied/received/
As what we are tracking here are the pages that have already been
received.
This patch adds ability to track down already copied
pages, it's necess
On 06/14/2017 09:53 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:39:53AM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
On 06/14/2017 08:12 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:36:33PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
This patch adds ability to track down already copied
pages, it's necessary for cal
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:39:53AM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> On 06/14/2017 08:12 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:36:33PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> >>This patch adds ability to track down already copied
> >>pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
> >>
On 06/14/2017 08:12 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:36:33PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
This patch adds ability to track down already copied
pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
postcopy migration feature, maybe for restore after
postcopy migration failure.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:36:33PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> This patch adds ability to track down already copied
> pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
> postcopy migration feature, maybe for restore after
> postcopy migration failure.
> Also it's necessary to solve shar
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:00:28PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 02:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
[...]
> >>Bitmap is placed into RAMBlock as another postcopy/precopy
> >>related bitmaps.
> >Why are we not using the TARGET_PAGE_SIZE as units of the bitmap?
> Page size per ram block
On 06/13/2017 02:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Alexey Perevalov wrote:
Hi
I think that it would make things clearer if we do a s/copied/received/
As what we are tracking here are the pages that have already been
received.
yes, sounds good
This patch adds ability to track down already copied
Alexey Perevalov wrote:
Hi
I think that it would make things clearer if we do a s/copied/received/
As what we are tracking here are the pages that have already been
received.
> This patch adds ability to track down already copied
> pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
> pos
This patch adds ability to track down already copied
pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
postcopy migration feature, maybe for restore after
postcopy migration failure.
Also it's necessary to solve shared memory issue in
postcopy livemigration. Information about copied pages
wi
11 matches
Mail list logo
