On 2 March 2018 at 17:35, Alistair Francis wrote:
> Ok will fix. I'll send a V2 out straight away, as today is my last day
> and it'd be great if I could get this done.
Sure -- if there are any further nits in v2 I'll just fix them
up when I put it into target-arm.next.
-- PMM
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 17:06, Alistair Francis
> wrote:
>
> Subject should say "core count" rather than "cluster size" ?
Yes, that was left over. I'll fix.
>
>> The cortex A53 TRM specifices that bits 24 and 25 of the L2CTLR register
>
> "spec
On 2 March 2018 at 17:06, Alistair Francis wrote:
Subject should say "core count" rather than "cluster size" ?
> The cortex A53 TRM specifices that bits 24 and 25 of the L2CTLR register
"specifies"
> specify the number of cores present and not the number of processors. To
"the number of cores
The cortex A53 TRM specifices that bits 24 and 25 of the L2CTLR register
specify the number of cores present and not the number of processors. To
report this correctly on machines with multiple CPU clusters (ARM's
big.LITTLE or Xilinx's ZynqMP) we need to allow the machine to overwrite
this value.
