On 21/09/2017 08:49, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:50 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> pflash toggles mr->romd_mode. So this assert does not always hold.
>>
>> 1) a device was added with !mr->romd_mode, therefore effectively not
>> creating a kvm slot as we want to trap every
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:50 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> pflash toggles mr->romd_mode. So this assert does not always hold.
>
> 1) a device was added with !mr->romd_mode, therefore effectively not
> creating a kvm slot as we want to trap every access (add = false).
> 2) mr->romd_mode was t
pflash toggles mr->romd_mode. So this assert does not always hold.
1) a device was added with !mr->romd_mode, therefore effectively not
creating a kvm slot as we want to trap every access (add = false).
2) mr->romd_mode was toggled on before remove it. There is now
actually no slot to remove
