On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 June 2015 at 23:17, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 1 June 2015 at 19:04, Peter Crosthwaite
>>> wrote:
+switch (access_type) {
+case 0:
+re
On 10 June 2015 at 23:17, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 1 June 2015 at 19:04, Peter Crosthwaite
>> wrote:
>>> +switch (access_type) {
>>> +case 0:
>>> +return *prot & PAGE_READ ? 0 : 0x00D;
>>> +case 1:
>>> +
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 June 2015 at 19:04, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> Unified MPU only. Uses ARM architecture major revision to switch
>> between PMSAv5 and v7 when ARM_FEATURE_MPU is set. PMSA v6 remains
>> unsupported and is asserted against.
>>
>> The r
On 1 June 2015 at 19:04, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Unified MPU only. Uses ARM architecture major revision to switch
> between PMSAv5 and v7 when ARM_FEATURE_MPU is set. PMSA v6 remains
> unsupported and is asserted against.
>
> The return code from get_phys_addr has to patched to handle the case
Unified MPU only. Uses ARM architecture major revision to switch
between PMSAv5 and v7 when ARM_FEATURE_MPU is set. PMSA v6 remains
unsupported and is asserted against.
The return code from get_phys_addr has to patched to handle the case
of a 0 FSR with error. Use -1 to indicate this condition.
S
