On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:47:17PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
>> >> Based on a git bisect, this patch break
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:47:17PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> >> Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
> >> the ivshmem device.
> >
> > I
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
>> Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
>> the ivshmem device.
>
> I think the following should fix it. Compiled-only -
> could you pls check?
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:03PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-04 11:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> >> Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
> >> the ivshmem device.
> >
> > I think the fol
On 2011-12-04 11:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
>> Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
>> the ivshmem device.
>
> I think the following should fix it. Compiled-only -
> could you pls check? If yes let'
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
> the ivshmem device.
I think the following should fix it. Compiled-only -
could you pls check? If yes let's apply to the stable branch.
-->
ivshmem: add missing
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:34:21PM -0700, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
> the ivshmem device.
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Only go over the table when function is masked.
> > This is not really imp
On 2011-12-03 00:34, Cam Macdonell wrote:
> So I believe my bug is due to the fact the new logic included in this
> patch requires msix_write_config() to be called to unmask the vectors.
> Virtio-pci calls msix_write_config(), but ivshmem does not (nor does
> PCIe so I'm not sure if it's also affe
Based on a git bisect, this patch breaks msi-x interrupt delivery in
the ivshmem device.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Only go over the table when function is masked.
> This is not really important for qemu.git but helps
> fix a bug in qemu-kvm.git.
>
> Signed-off-b
Only go over the table when function is masked.
This is not really important for qemu.git but helps
fix a bug in qemu-kvm.git.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
hw/msix.c | 21 ++---
hw/pci.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/msi
10 matches
Mail list logo
