On 11/20/2015 04:59 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> "s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
> iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
> more memory efficient.
>
> Meanwhile, rename it to done_bitmap, to reflect the intention.
>
> Si
On 23/11/2015 10:55, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> Why? I think bitmap_set is a better match with bitmap_new below.
>>
>> set_bit() is quicker than bitmap_set() if you only set one bit.
>
> How much quicker is it? This doesn't sound convincing enough for me to lose
> the
> readability.
Substantially.
On 11/23/2015 05:55 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 11/23 17:24, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> On 11/23/2015 05:19 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11/23 17:01, Wen Congyang wrote:
On 11/20/2015 05:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> "s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using
>
On Mon, 11/23 17:24, Wen Congyang wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 05:19 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Mon, 11/23 17:01, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2015 05:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >>> "s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using
> >>> any
> >>> iterator which HBitmap is goo
On 11/23/2015 05:19 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 11/23 17:01, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> On 11/20/2015 05:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> "s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
>>> iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
>>> more me
On Mon, 11/23 17:01, Wen Congyang wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 05:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > "s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
> > iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
> > more memory efficient.
> >
> > Meanwhile, rename i
On 11/20/2015 05:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> "s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
> iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
> more memory efficient.
>
> Meanwhile, rename it to done_bitmap, to reflect the intention.
>
> Sign
On Fri, 11/20 18:53, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 20.11.2015 12:59, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >"s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
> >iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
> >more memory efficient.
> >
> >Meanwhile,
On 20.11.2015 12:59, Fam Zheng wrote:
"s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
more memory efficient.
Meanwhile, rename it to done_bitmap, to reflect the intention.
Signed-off-by: Fam
"s->bitmap" tracks done sectors, we only check bit states without using any
iterator which HBitmap is good for. Switch to "Bitmap" which is simpler and
more memory efficient.
Meanwhile, rename it to done_bitmap, to reflect the intention.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block/backup.c | 11 ++--
10 matches
Mail list logo